Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Dhote, Krishna Kumar
- Calibrating Neighbourhood Preferences in the Land Value Contour Model
Abstract Views :213 |
PDF Views:90
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, IN
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 119, No 6 (2020), Pagination: 1001-1009Abstract
Neighbourhood is a spatial self-contained residential colony maintaining effective socio-economic control within a city. The study presumes that people’s preference for residential location and choice of facilities might be a robust predictor of their neighbourhood demand. Their preferences reflect in terms of land value. GIS-based spatial contour model was used to examine whether the effect of residential preferences varied in terms of residential land value. The study found significant variations in residents’ preferences for accessible facilities in a city. The finding reveals that preferences for residential choice depend on many factors. Residents are willing to pay for easily accessible facilities which could be observed in the residential land value contour model of GIS.Keywords
Accessible Facilities, Contour Model, Neighbourhood Preferences, Residential Land Value.Full Text
References
- Nichols, J. B., Oliner, S. D. and Mulhall, M. R., Commercial and residential land prices across the United States. Federal Reserve Board, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
- The Planning Commission of India, The challenges of urbanization in India. Appraisal Report, Delhi, 2011.
- Topcu, M. and Kubat, A. S., The analysis of urban features that afftect land values in residential areas. In Seventh International Space Syntax Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, 2009, pp. 26:1–26:9.
- Lee, Y. P., Determinants of Singapore residential land value, Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Singapore, 1996.
- Bhopal City Development Plan, Mehta and Associates, Bhopal, 2008.
- Grimes, A. and Liang, Y., Spatial determinants of land prices in Auckland: does the metropolitan urban limit have an effect? Motu Economic and Public Policy Research, New Zealand, 2007.
- Saefuddin, A., Widyaningsih, Y., Ginting, A. and Mamat, M., Land price model considering spatial factors. Asian J. Math. Stat., 2012, 5(4), 132–141.
- Emoh, F. I., Oni, A. O. and Egolum, C. C., Prioritizing residential land value determinants in Onitsha, Nigeria. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., 2013, 3(3), 201–213.
- Dutt, A. K. and Khan, A. A. M., Multi-peaked urban land values: city of Akron Case. Ohio J. Sci., 1982, 82(3), 114–119.
- Kivell, P., Land and the City: Pattern and Process of Urban Change, Routledge, Wuhan, China, 1993.
- Adams, D., Urban Planning and the Development Process, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London, 1994.
- Phe, H. H. and Wakely, P., Status, quality and the other trade-off: towards a new theory of urban residential location. Urban Stud., 2000, 37(1), 7–35.
- Ai, P., Residential land value modelling: case study of Hankou, China. International Institute for Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, Urban Planning and Land Administration, The Nitherlands, 2005.
- Yeates, M. H. and Garner, B. J., The North American City, Harper Collins, New York, 1971.
- Han, S. S. and Basuki, A., The spatial pattern of land values in Jakarta. Urban Stud., 2001, 38, 1841–1857.
- Miller, N. G. and Geltner, D. M., Real Estate Principles for the New Economy, South-Western Education Pub., Cincinnati, 2004.
- Ogbuefi, J. and Egbenta, R., Relationship between transport services and property values in Enugu, Nigeria. J. Sci. Technol. Res., 2002, 1(1), 94–100.
- Udo, G. and Egbenta, R., Effect of domestic waste dumpsites on rental values of residential properties in Enugu. Nigerian J. Dev. Stud., 2007, 6(1), 79–97.
- Kauko, T., Residential property value and locational externalities – on the complementarity and substitutability of approaches. J. Property Invest. Finan., 2003, 21(3), 250–270.
- Olayiwola, L., Adeleye, O. and Oduwaye, A., Spatial variation in residential land value determinants in Lagos, Nigeria. In Fifth FIG Regional Conference, Accra, Ghana, 2006.
- Morandé, F., Petermann, A. and Vargas, M., Determinants of vacant urban land evidence from Santiago of Chile, Chile. J. Real Estate Finance Econ., 2008, 40(2), 188–202.
- Tamba, V., Kabba, S. and Li, J., Determinants of urban land price in freetown, Sierra Leone. J. Am. Sci., 2011, 7(2), 213–223.
- Uju, I. V. and Iyanda, S. T., Comparative analysis of the determinants of residential land values. Chin. Bus. Rev., 2012, 11(2), 187–192.
- Dowall, D. E. and Monkkonen, P., Chennai Urban Land Market Assessment, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
- Oduwaye, L., Spatial variations of values of residential land use in Lagos metropolis. Int. Multi-Discip. J. Ethiopia, 2009, 3(2), 381– 403.
- Bhargava, A., Determinants of property values, Jaipur city. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., 2013, 3(9), 1–15.
- Eckert, J. K., Property Appraisal and Assessment Administration (First edn), International Association of Assessing Officers, Chicago, USA, 1990.
- Lochl, M. A., Modeling hedonic residential rents for land use and transport simulation while considering spatial effects. J. Transp. Land Use, 2010, 3(2), 39–63.
- Goffette-Nagot, F., Reginster, I. and Thomas, I., A spatial analysis of residential land prices in Belgium: accessibility, linguistic border and environmental amenities, Belgium. Reg. Stud., 2011, 45(9), 1253–1268.
- A Grounded Theory Approach for The Assessment of Urban Development Policies in Indian Cities
Abstract Views :201 |
PDF Views:98
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, IN
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 121, No 12 (2021), Pagination: 1561-1571Abstract
Urbanization in India has led to the development of new urban centres and an increase in the number of million-plus cities. The planning principles keep on evolving with time. In India, these principles are implemented through development plans. This study examines the extent to which Indian urban planning policies address contemporary urban planning principles in the perspective of rapidly evolving global urban policies. Development plans of 13 million-plus state capital cities across India have been analysed following grounded theory. The study reveals that Indian cities are not completely embracing global contemporary urban planning principles in their development plans, and the provision of these principles also differs among cities. The study proposes suggestive planning measures which might be incorporated in the urban planning process to address the challenges arising out of complexities of urbanization. The study explores how development plans endorse and implement particular urban development strategies and more generally, contributes to enforcement of contemporary urban planning principles. The goal of the study is to establish a link between contemporary urban development principles articulated through the development plans.Keywords
Development Plans, Grounded Theory, Million-Plus Cities, Urban Planning Principles.Full Text
References
- MoUD, Model Guidelines for Urban Land Policy, Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India (GoI), 2007.
- Edadan, N., Structural determinants of unregulated urban growth and residential land pricing: case of Bangalore. J. Urban Plann. Develop., 2015, 141(4), 1–9.
- Turok, I., The evolution of national urban policies: a global overview. Cities Alliance, Nairobi, Kenya, 2014.
- Shaban, A., Kourtit, K. and Nijkamp, P., India’s urban system: sustainability and imbalanc growth of cities. Sustainability, 2020, 2941(12), 1–20.
- Kshirsagar, J. B. and Srinivas, R., Inclusive urban planning and devlopment: emerging issues and challenges. In 61st National Town and Country Planners Congress, Ahmedabad: Institute of Town Planners, India, Delhi, 2013, pp. 119–127.
- Jothilakshmy, D. N. and Arulmalar, R., Inclusive and integrated strategies for cost effective sustainable habitat –an effective paradigm for housing the marginalised in Indian context. In 61st NTCP Congress, Ahmedabad, ITPI, Delhi, India, 2013, pp. 219–221.
- KPMG, Decoding housing for all by 2022, KPMG International Cooperative, Delhi, 2014.
- Sudhira, H. S. and Gururaja, K. V., Population crunch in India: is it urban or still rural? Curr. Sci., 2012, 103(1), 37–40.
- Taipale, K., Challenges and Way Forward in the Urban Sector, European Union, Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
- MoHUA, National Urban Transport Policy, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affaris, GoI, 2011.
- Tiwari, P. and Rao, J., Housing Markets and Housing Policies in India, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan, 2016.
- Zope, M. R., The planning strategies for urban land use pattern: a case study of Pune City, India. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol., 2013, 2(7), 2682–2687.
- MacDonald, M., Urban and Regional Development Plans Formulation and Implementation, Town and Country Planning Organization, MoUD, GoI, 2015.
- Corrigan, M. B., Dunphy, R. T., Gabel, N. M., Levitt, R. L., McMahon, E. T. and Pawlukiewicz, M., Ten Principles for Smart Growth on the Suburban Fringe, Urban Land Institute, Washington, 2004.
- Saliba, S., Ten Urban Planning Principles Every Humanitarian Should Know, 2015; https://www.iied.org/policy-planning (retrieved on 7 December 2018).
- Livingston, A., What is Smart Growth –Urban Planning Principles, Benefits and Examples. 2017; http://www.moneycrashers.com/category/lifestyle/ (retrieved on 7 December 2018).
- Banerjee, S. and Dhote, K. K., Exploring inclusive dimension for the assessment of level of inclusion. Res. J. Eng. Sci., 2015, 4(7), 1–9.
- ITPI, Town and Country Planning, 2015; www.itpi.org.in/pages/planning-as-a-career (retrieved on 7 January 2015), Institute of Town Planners, Delhi.
- Pandey, S. C., The challenges of contract/project implementation. J. Def. Stud., 2010, 4(1), 65–78.
- Mahadevia, D., Joshi, R. and Sharma, R., Integrating the urban poor in planning and governance systems, India. Workshop Report, Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology, National Resource Centre, Ahmedabad, 2009.
- Sarin, M., Urban Planning in the Third World: The Chandigarh Experience, Mansell Publ Ltd, London, UK, 1982.
- Minea, E. M., Overview on urban development through urban planning principles. Trans. Rev. Admin. Sci., 2008, 24(E), 77–86.
- Matt, L., Prince Charles’ 10 Principles of Urban Planning. Arch. Rev., 2014; http://www.architecturalreview.com (retrieved on 7 December 2018).
- UN-Habitat, International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning, Nairobi, Kenya, 2015.
- Soltani, A. and Sharifi, E., A case study of sustainable urban planning principles in Curitiba (Brazil) and their applicability in Shiraz (Iran). Int. J. Dev. Sustain., 2012, 1(2), 120–134.
- Valluri, Modern Principles of City and Town Planning, 2017; www.valluriorg.com/blog/category/city-planning-and-town-planning/ (retrieved on 29 January 2019), City Planning and Town Planning, Smart Infrastructure.
- Beltrão, G., India: Promoting Inclusive Urban Development in Indian Cities, MoHUPA, New Delhi, 2013.
- Entrepreneurial Urbanism and Design, 10 Principles of Intelligent Urbanism in City Planning and Urban Design, 2015; http://eud.leneurbanity.com (retrieved on 7 January 2019).
- Lim, C., Kim, K.-J. and Maglio, P. P., Smart cities with big data: reference models, challenges, and considerations. Cities, 2018, 82, 86–99.
- UNICEF, Urban Planning Principles, 2017; http://www.behance.net/ (retrieved on 7 December 2018).
- Charles, A., General Principles of Successful Strategic Urban Planning, RTPI, Leusden, The Netherlands, 2017.
- Raparthi, K., Assessing smart-growth strategies in Indian cities: grounded theory approach to planning practice. J. Urban Plann. Develop., 2015, 141(4), 05014031_1-10.
- Zhao, Z., Lacono, M., Lari, A. and Levinson, D., Value capture for transportation finance. Soc. Behav. Sci., 2012, 48, 435–448.
- Saaty, T. L. and Sagir, M., Choosing the best city of the future. J. Urban Manage., 2015, 4(1), 3–23.
- Census of India, Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Ministry of Home Affairs, GoI, 2011.
- Yang, B., Xu, T. and Shi, L., Analysis on sustainable urban development levels and trends in China’s cities. J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 141, 868–880.
- Li, F., Liu, X. S. and Fu, R., Evalution method and its application for urban sustainable development. Acta. Ecol. Sin., 2007, 27(11), 4793–4792.
- UNDP, Human Development Report 2009 –Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development, UNDP, New York, USA, 2009.
- UN-Habitat, State of the world’s cities 2012/2013. Prosperity of cities, Nairobi, Kenya, 2012.
- UN-Habitat, Global urban indicators database version 2, Nairobi, Kenya, 2002.
- Zhou, X., Yang, Z. and Xu, L., Eco-security monitoring index system for urban development zone. Proc. Environ. Sci., 2010, 2, 1199–1205.
- Schlör, H., Venghaus, S. and Hake, J.-F., The FEW–nexus city index –measuring urban resilience. Appl. Energy, 2018, 210, 382–392.
- Berke, P. R. and Conroy, M. M., Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 2000, 66(1), 21–33.
- Portney, K., Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously: Economic Development, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
- Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, USA, Newbury Park, CA, 1994, 2nd edn.
- Assessment Framework for Public Satisfaction on the Urban Water Management Attributes in Central India
Abstract Views :112 |
PDF Views:71
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, IN
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 5 (2023), Pagination: 591-598Abstract
Urban areas of the present and future can be sustainably transformed by involving community participation in decision-making because of their local knowledge. Most of0 the Indian cities have water management problems like accessibility, availability, quality, adequate infrastructure and user charges. Urban water management is one of the prime responsibilities of urban local bodies in India, but there is no provision to assess public satisfaction. This study focuses on the assessment of the satisfaction level of the public on urban water management in Central India to improve the efficiency of urban water. The methodology and proposed framework will help in distinguishing the poor functioning among water attributes that need to be strengthened to maximize the efficiency of the water management system.Keywords
Assessment Framework, City-Planners, Community Participation, Public Satisfaction, Urban Water Management.Full Text
References
- Kumar, S. and Dhote, K. K., A grounded theory approach for the assessment of urban development policies in Indian cities. Curr. Sci., 2021, 121(12), 1561–1571.
- Hans, A. and Bharat, A., Water as a resource: different perspectives in literature. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 2014, 3(10), 27–34.
- Kumar, S. and Dhote, K. K., Calibrating neighbourhood preferences in the land value contour model. Curr. Sci., 2020, 119(6), 1001–1009.
- Shah, M., Urban water systems in India: a way forward. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, 2016.
- Dhote, K. K. and Banerjee, S., Assessing inclusive approach in urban planning process for the case of Madhya Pradesh. Int. J. Town Plann. Manage., 2015, 1(1), 1–13.
- Mitchell, G. V., Applying integrated urban water management concepts: a review of Australian experience. Environ. Manage., 2006, 37(5), 589–605.
- Kyessi, A. G., Community-based urban water management in fringe neighbourhoods: the case of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Habitat Int., 2005, 29(1), 1–25.
- Hans, A. and Bharat, A., Exploring indicators for the assessment of urban water. Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci., 2015, 4(9), 69–74.
- Brown, A. and Matlock, M. D., A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies. The Sustainability Consortium, 2011.
- He, C., Liu, Z., Wu, J., Pan, X., Fang, Z., Li, J. and Bryan, B. A., Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nature Commun., 2021, 12(1), 1–11.
- WHO, Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017: special focus on inequalities. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
- Ananga, E. O., Agong, S. G., Acheampong, M., Njoh, A. J. and Hayombe, P., Examining the effect of community participation on beneficiary satisfaction with the work of water management committee in urban community-based operated water schemes. Sustain. Water Resour. Manage., 2020, 6(49), 1–13.
- Farrelly, M. and Brown, R., Rethinking urban water management: experimentation as a way forward? Global Environ. Change, 2011, 21(2), 721–732.
- Wong, T. H. F. and Brown, R., The water sensitive city: principles for practice. Water Sci. Technol., 2009, 60(3), 673–682.
- Pahl-Wostl, C., Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour. Manage., 2007, 21, 49–62.
- van der Brugge, R. and Rotmans, J., Towards transition management of European water resources. Water Resour. Manage., 2007, 21(1), 249–267.
- FAO, The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture-managing systems at risk. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome and Earthscan, London, 2011.
- Allan, J. V., Fielding, K. S., Kenway, S. J. and Head, B. W., Community perspectives on sustainable urban water security. Urban Water J., 2021, 13(6), 1–11.
- Dean, A., Lindsay, J., Fielding, K. and Smith, L., Fostering water sensitive citizenship – community profiles of engagement in water-related issues. Environ. Sci. Policy, 2016, 55(1), 238–247.
- Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A. and Meek, J. W., Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Admin. Rev., 2006, 66, 76–88.
- Donald, F. et al., A systematic review of the effectiveness of advanced practice nurses in long-term care. J. Adv. Nurs., 2013, 69(10), 2148–2161.
- Yang, K. and Pandey, S. K., Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: when does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Admin. Rev., 2011, 71(6), 880–892.
- Amado, M. P., Santos, C. V., Moura, E. B. and Silva, V. G., Public participation in sustainable urban planning. Int. J. Hum. Soc. Sci., 2010, 5(2), 102–108.
- Leicht, A., Heiss, J. and Byun, W. J., Issues and trends in Education for Sustainable Development, UNESCO, 2005.
- Jerome, B., Towards knowledge societies, UNESCO World Report, 2005.
- Devi, S. J., Joseph, B., Karunakaran, K., Anuradha, B. and Devi, R., People’s attitude towards paying for water. Curr. Sci., 2009, 97(9), 1296–1302.
- Patil, S., Bhave, N. and Kulkarni, H., Situational analysis of ground-water in Madhya Pradesh, UNDP, 2019.
- Jemmali, H. and Matoussi, M. S., A multidimensional analysis of water poverty at local scale: application of improved water poverty index for Tunisia. Water Policy, 2013, 15(1), 98–115.
- Ishaku, H. T. and Majid, M. R., Community participation: alternative approach to water supply in Nigerian rural communities. In The International Conference on Built Environment in Developing Countries, Malaysia, 2010.
- Maryati, S. and Humaira, A. N. S., Water supply provision characteristics in Peri-Urban area. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2018, 202, 012033.
- McKenzie, D. and Ray, I., Urban water supply in India: status, reform options and possible lessons. Water Policy, 2009, 11(4), 442–460.
- Yang, J. C., Pattanayak, S. K., Jonson, F. R., Mansfield, C., van den Berg, C. and Jones, K., Unpackaging demand for water service quality: evidence from conjoint surveys in Sri Lanka. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3817, 2006.
- Das, R., Laishram, B. and Jawed, M., Public participation in urban water supply projects – the case of South-West Guwahati, India. Water Res., 2019, 165, 1–11.
- Abrishamchi, A., Ebrahimian, A., Tajrishi, M. and Mariño, M. A., Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 2005, 131(4), 326–335.
- UNICEF, Progress on sanitation and drinking water, United National International Children’s Emergency Fund, Bangkok, 2015.
- Jie, L. et al., Water ethics and water resource management, UNESCO, 2011.
- Chang, H., Parandvash, G. H. and Shandas, V., Spatial variations of single-family residential water consumption in Portland, Oregon. Urban Geogr., 2010, 31(7), 953–972.
- WHO, The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
- Preparedness of Indian Cities for the Implementation of Urban Planning Schemes
Abstract Views :93 |
PDF Views:56
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India., IN
2 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India., IN
1 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India., IN
2 Department of Architecture and Planning, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal 462 003, India., IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 11 (2023), Pagination: 1282-1289Abstract
The implementation of global, modern urban planning principles has influenced India’s new urban planning and development schemes, which are outlined in statutory development plans. This study assesses the level of preparedness of Indian cities to implement these schemes by evaluating the extent to which their development plan policies address global, modern urban principles. The policies were graded for each principle, and the cities were ranked based on their total grade. The study reveals that Indian cities have not fully adopted modern urban principles in their development plan policies, and there are significant variations in the implementation of these principles across different cities.Keywords
City Rank, Development Plan, Modern Principles, Scheme Implementation, Urban Planning.Full Text
References
- Kumar, S. and Dhote, K. K., A grounded theory approach for the assessment of urban development policies in Indian cities. Curr. Sci., 2021, 121(12), 1561–1571.
- Singh, S., Dhote, K. K. and Kumar, S., Assessment framework for public satisfaction on the urban water management attributes in Central India. Curr. Sci., 2023, 124(5), 591–598.
- Turok, I., The evolution of national urban policies: a global overview. Cities Alliance, Nairobi, Kenya, 2014.
- Shaban, A., Kourtit, K. and Nijkamp, P., India’s urban system: sustainability and imbalanc growth of cities. Sustainability, 2020, 2941(12), 1–20.
- Kshirsagar, J. B. and Srinivas, R., Inclusive urban planning and development: emerging issues and challenges. In 61st National Town and Country Planners Congress, Ahmedabad, Institute of Town Planners, India (ITPI), Delhi, 2013, pp. 119–127.
- KPMG, Decoding housing for all by 2022, KPMG International Cooperative, Delhi, 2014.
- Sudhira, H. S. and Gururaja, K. V., Population crunch in India: is it urban or still rural? Curr. Sci., 2012, 103(1), 37–40.
- Taipale, K., Challenges and way forward in the urban sector, European Union, Brussels, Belgium, 2012.
- MoHUA, National urban transport policy, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India (GoI), 2011.
- Tiwari, P. and Rao, J., Housing Markets and Housing Policies in India, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, 2016.
- Zope, M. R., The planning strategies for urban land use pattern: a case study of Pune City, India. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci., Eng. Technol., 2013, 2(7), 2682–2687.
- MacDonald, M., Urban and regional development plans formu-lation and implementation. Town and Country Planning Organization. Ministry of Urban Development, GoI, 2015.
- MoUD, Model guidelines for urban land policy, Ministry of Urban Development, GoI, 2007.
- Edadan, N., Structural determinants of unregulated urban growth and residential land pricing: case of Bangalore. J. Urban Plann. Dev., 2015, 141(4), 1–9.
- Saliba, S., Ten urban planning principles every humanitarian should know, 2015; https://www.iied.org/policy-planning (retrieved on 7 December 2018).
- Livingston, A., What is smart growth – urban planning principles, benefits and examples, 2017; http://www.moneycrashers.com/ category/lifestyle/ (retrieved on 7 December 2018).
- Banerjee, S. and Dhote, K. K., Exploring inclusive dimension for the assessment of level of inclusion. Res. J. Eng. Sci., 2015, 4(7), 1–9.
- MoHUA, National urban policy framework, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, GoI, 2018.
- ITPI, Town and country planning, 2015; www.itpi.org.in/pages/ planning-as-a-career (retrieved on 7 January 2015).
- Pandey, S. C., The challenges of contract/project implementation. J. Def. Stud., 2010, 4(1), 65–78.
- Mahadevia, D., Joshi, R. and Sharma, R., Integrating the urban poor in planning and governance systems, India. Workshop Report, Centre for Environmental Planning and Technology (CEPT), National Resource Centre, Ahmedabad, 2009.
- Sarin, M., Urban Planning in the Third World: The Chandigarh Experience, Mansell Publ. Ltd, London, UK, 1982.
- Lim, C., Kim, K.-J. and Maglio, P. P., Smart cities with big data: reference models, challenges, and considerations. Cities, 2018, 82, 86–99.
- Beltrão, G., India: Promoting inclusive urban development in Indian cities, MoHUPA, Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Allevia-tion, 2013.
- Charles, A., General principles of successful strategic urban plan-ning. RTPI, Leusden, The Netherlands, 2017.
- Minea, E. M., Overview on urban development through urban planning principles. Transylv. Rev. Admin. Sci., 2008, 24(E), 77– 86.
- Soltani, A. and Sharifi, E., A case study of sustainable urban planning principles in Curitiba (Brazil) and their applicability in Shiraz (Iran). Int. J. Dev. Sustain., 2012, 1(2), 120–134.
- UN-Habitat., International guidelines on urban and territorial plan-ning, Nairobi, Kenya, 2015.
- Webster, C., Gated cities of tomorrow. The Town Plann. Rev., 2001, 72(2), 149–170.
- Keil, R., Towers in the park, bungalows in the garden: peripheral densities, metropolitan scales and the political cultures of post-sub-urbia. Built Environ., 2015, 41(4), 579–596.
- Saaty, T. L. and Sagir, M., Choosing the best city of the future. J. Urban Manage., 2015, 4(1), 3–23.
- Mello, J. C., Meza, L. A. and Lacerda, F. G., A DEA model with a non discritionary variable for Olympic evaluation. Pesqui. Oper., 2012, 32, 21–29.
- Berke, P. R. and Conroy, M. M., Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans. J. Am. Plann. Assoc., 2000, 66(1), 21–33.
- Portney, K., Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously: Economic Deve-lopment, the Environment, and Quality of Life in American Cities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
- Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA, USA, 1994, 2nd edn.